The 6.1-inch OLED display and Face ID that the upcoming iPhone SE 4 will have are causing concern in the industry. However, the business is moving forward with several design decisions, such as keeping the notch and only having one rear camera, as well as removing the Action Button.
Apple’s upcoming iPhone SE 4, which is expected to hit the market in early 2025, has been creating a lot of buzz among enthusiasts and industry experts due to several design choices that have been criticized. Although the device is expected to bring some significant upgrades, such as a 6.1-inch OLED display and Face ID integration, three decisions have emerged as points of contention.
Retention of the Notch Design
Despite the trend towards the Dynamic Island feature in recent iPhone models, reports suggest that the iPhone SE 4 will retain the traditional notch design. This choice is seen as a cost-saving measure, allowing Apple to utilize existing components. However, critics argue that this decision may make the device appear outdated compared to its contemporaries.
Single Rear Camera System
According to leaked photos, the iPhone SE 4 will only have one back camera, as opposed to the more costly models’ dual-camera setups. This would be in accordance with the SE line’s branding as a low-cost gadget, but it calls into question the device’s photographic capabilities in a market where multi-lens systems are now commonplace.
No Action Button
Unlike the latest iPhone series that have included an Action Button with further functionality, the iPhone SE 4 will not include the feature. This has resulted in the debate regarding how much to compromise on low prices while offering new features that make use of the phone more enjoyable.
These design decisions point out the strategy Apple has been adopting to differentiate its budget-friendly SE line from its flagship els. While the iPhone S4 promises to bring forth modern features like an OLED display and Face ID, the retention of some design elements and the omission of others point out the company’s approach to balancing cost and functionality.
